This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
هذا الملف هو تشويه للعلم الموريتاني إذ لا يحافظ علي شكل الهلال والنجمة في العلم القديم لذلك نطلب حذفه ونطلب من صاحب الملف التواصل معنا علي البريد ibentiris@gmail.com لأجل إعطائه الملف الصحيح مرفق بالمقاييس ومفاتيح الألوان ابن تيرس (talk) 03:29, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: This file is in use on many, many projects. Commons should not delete used files even if they're inaccurate. See COM:NPOV. Personally, I think there's a violation of COM:OVERWRITE here, but that's not a reason for deletion either. --bjh21 (talk) 11:20, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Regardless of the nominator’s standing or supposed motives, a problem with the crescent shape (which I gather from Google Translate is the issue) is not cause for deletion. Inaccuracies should be tagged and discussed instead, and there’s always the option to create alternative versions.—Odysseus1479 (talk) 18:48, 2 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as there's no policy-based reason to delete. That being said, while I support the speedy keeping of this file, I strongly recommend that it's changed, but I acknowledge that this is not the place to discuss that. BrendonTheWizard (talk) 22:23, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As for the issues with the design, this was what I was sent from their Embassy in Tokyo, Japan, by Japanese vexillologist Nozomi Kariyasu. I drew the design based off of this document, which was a radical change from the March 2017 proposed law to what eventually was adopted late of 2017. User:Zscout370(Return fire)04:04, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And I will gladly work with all parties to get this design right. I still think my issue is, along with others, is what was the legal source or point where the design got changed from the 15/70/15 to what their Embassy in Japan sent us. I personally have not found that legal point yet and I am not having much luck pointing to where it happened, though I remembered this just now. User:Zscout370(Return fire)04:22, 28 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.